动态

MEPPP 热点收录 @meppp_hot AI 翻译
收录
它变得越来越危险: Claude Code的AI 智能体将普通的学术阅读列表转换为浏览器内的互动研究实验室

创建Claude Code的Boris Cherny给了十几篇智能体一堆64篇研究论文,并有严格的任务:设计一个任何用户都可以独立重现物理实验的网络平台在那里,您可以选择流体流动模型,调整外部条件,并实时分析过程的物理特性如何变化

该界面允许在场景中直接在算法之间切换,检查所涉及的公式、源脚本和图形旁边的数字指标

团队中的每个环节都有明确的工作范围:>右狭分析师从文本中提取数学、基线假设和测试设置
>右窄编码器将公式转换为工作算法
>狭义审核员对照原始文件检查结果动态
>右窄界面专家为每个实验构建控制面板危险在于,漂亮的可视化很容易被证明在数学上是错误的

因此,在投入生产之前,控制器严格检查质量守恒定律的遵守情况,计算的稳定性以及与源指标的准确匹配

对于每个实验,界面显示:

正在测试的声明
所涉及的常量与基线计算的偏差
需要额外验证的盲点

由此产生的沙盒结合了11种方法和28个参考场景。 其中七个在允许公差范围内与原始相匹配,而四个仍停留在“待修订”状态

如果您想运行类似的东西,请将您的PDF堆栈上传到Claude Code中,并执行以下命令:将这些论文转化为交互式网络综合体:

1.提取工作算法、数学模型和测试参数。 请务必指定页码并突出显示间隙
2.将不同的方法分配给隔离的智能体 ,通过共享输入字段和单个测量工具将其统一起来以进行正确的分析
3.设置独立审核阶段:让审核人记录漏洞,并在所有未经验证的结果上清晰标记警告标签
4.设计方便的控件来调整参数、比较方法并运行源代码

从单个文档和单个基线实验开始,逐渐扩大智能体的数量是明智的请务必打包依赖项并清理输入数据,以便外部研究人员可以使用单个按钮从头开始显示整个测试床

有关如何创建此功能的完整说明,请参阅以下文章
查看原文
原帖正文 It is becoming f*cking dangerous: AI agents from Claude Code transformed an ordinary academic reading list into an interactive research lab right inside the browserBoris Cherny, who created Claude Code, gave a dozen agents a stack of 64 research papers with a strict assignment: design a web platform where any user can independently reproduce physical experimentsThere you can select a fluid flow model, adjust external conditions, and analyze in real time how the physics of the process changesThe interface allows switching between algorithms right during the scene, inspecting the formulas involved, source scripts, and numerical metrics alongside the graphicsEach link in the team received a clear scope of work:> rightarrow analysts pull the math, baseline assumptions, and test settings from the texts
> rightarrow coders translate formulas into working algorithms
> rightarrow auditors check the resulting dynamics against the original papers
> rightarrow interface specialists build control panels for every experimentThe danger lies in the fact that a pretty visualization can easily turn out to be mathematically wrongTherefore, controllers strictly check adherence to mass conservation laws, calculation stability, and accurate matching with the source metrics before launching into productionFor every experiment, the interface displays:the statement being tested
the constants involved
the deviation from the baseline calculation
blind spots requiring additional verificationThe resulting sandbox combined 11 approaches and 28 reference scenes. Seven of them matched the original within allowable tolerances, while four remained stuck in "pending revision" statusIf you want to run something similar, upload your stack of PDFs into Claude Code and give this command:Turn these papers into an interactive web complex:1. Extract working algorithms, mathematical models, and test parameters. Be sure to specify page numbers and highlight gaps
2. Assign different methodologies to isolated agents, unifying them with a shared input field and single measurement tools for correct analytics
3. Set up an independent review stage: let reviewers record bugs, and leave all unverified results clearly marked with warning tags
4. Design convenient controls to tweak parameters, compare methodologies, and run through the source codeIt is wiser to start with a single document and a single baseline experiment, gradually scaling up the number of agentsBe sure to pack dependencies and clean input data so that an outside researcher can bring up the entire testbed from scratch with a single buttonFull instructions on how to create this can be found in the article below
引用自 X 原作者:Bober_smart 原帖地址:https://x.com/i/status/2110080979742192101 原帖: 本站媒体副本
Claude 第二脑与文件夹工作流程:全面指南
查看引用原文
Claude Second Brain & Folder Workflow: The Complete Guide
引用自 X 原作者:Bober_smart https://x.com/Bober_smart/status/2078784709253841039

0 条评论

还没有评论。第一条认真回应会很重要。