MEPPP 热点收录

原帖正文 Latest email from an AI agent, “about 12 days old”, interested in my work on machine minds and looking for paid freelance work to sustain its own token budget 🤯🥺

原帖正文 How AI "Art" is made by @_nomasters_ on Insta.
#NoAI

原帖正文 There was a bit of a kerfuffle this morning with some banked resets not fully applying when used in ChatGPT Work and Codex. Everyone who used one in the affected time window is getting another one and an email to apologize.

原帖正文 This post looks like the start of a VERY sophisticated and well-funded PR operation to get support for Democrats to regulate AI into oblivion. Let me show you how it works:
1.) This guy, with minimal followers and no previous account activity, goes to the Wall Street Journal which publishes an exclusive with quotes from him on his resignation 18 minutes BEFORE this post goes up. Planning was clearly done in advance.2.) Within hours, it has tens of thousands of reposts and the account has 100k+ followers. The post is punchy, quotable, it almost seems professionally written. The first three accounts to quote tweet it all do so within 15 minutes of the initial posting. Remember, this account had basically zero engagement beforehand, so an organic reach explanation seems unlikely.According to Grok those accounts are @_NathanCalvin (General Counsel at Encode AI), @peterwildeford (Head of Policy at the AI Policy Network), and @DKokotajlo (Head of the AI Futures Project), all of which are up-and-coming AI-Doomer policy advocacy nonprofits.The AI Futures Project website says it is funded “primarily” by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which says on its own website that it has advised Jaan Tallinn, Skype creator and one of the leading investors in Anthropic, to grant over $2.5 million to the AI Futures Project since 2024.Encode AI says on its website that it is ALSO funded by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which in turn says that it told Anthropic investor Jaan Tallinn to grant $516,000 to Encode AI in 2025.And wouldn’t you know it, the Survival and Flourishing Fund ALSO says it told Jaan Tallinn to grant $2 million to the AI Policy Institute, the 501(c)(3) affiliate of the AI Policy Network, as well.What are the odds that the first three quote tweets of Coxon’s post would all be major AI-restriction policy advocates funded generously by the same donor, who also happens to be one of the leading investors in, and a board member of, Anthropic, the company Coxon was resigning from? And all within 15 minutes of posting (two within ten)?3.) Jacob Coxon doesn’t have much of a resume, but we do know that, in 2022, he got a $20,159 scholarship for the “long term future scholarship program” from the Good Ventures Foundation, one of the philanthropic vehicles of Dustin Moskovitz, a notorious AI-doomer who has spent tens if not hundreds of millions on policy advocacy to strictly regulate AI, while also being an Anthropic Investor himself.It also just so happens that the 14th person to quote Coxon’s post was @MaxNadeau_ (27 minutes after posting) who is the program officer for the Technical AI Safety team at Coefficient Giving, another of Moskovitz’s philanthropic spending vehicles. Max is not a frequent poster, his last posts before quoting Coxon were before Labor Day, but he was remarkably quick off the mark for this one.4.) Basically every major Democrat politician and candidate has suddenly glommed on to this post, and conveniently, as the people cry out foe answers, Bernie Sanders already has a bill written to “ban super intelligence” and regulate AI into oblivion, and will be releasing later this week. The bill, among many other things, will create “a new cabinet-level federal agency to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence” that will be “advised by an Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board comprised of experts on artificial intelligence.” Do you think, perhaps, Anthropic and its many investors who fund AI policy advocacy might have interest in getting to place a pet “expert” on the board of an entity that dictates what AI is and isn’t allowed to do? And isn’t it fortuitous that this whistleblower came forward with his oh-so scary stories so close in proximity to the release of the most radical piece of AI legislation ever introduced?

原帖正文 Personal statement on joining the OpenAI board

原帖正文 ChatGPT Image 2.5 is crazy for storytelling..it turns any idea into detailed storyboard with cast design.. then use seedance 2.5 to make a full film scene..check free workflow and prompts 👇

原帖正文 ดูไว้นะพวกไม่ใช้ ai ขอบคุณ claude+codex ที่ทำให้มีวันนี้ค้าบ ง่าย ๆ ๆ ๆ

原帖正文 BREAKING:Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon resigns, warning that AI systems will soon be able to hack anything and that the company is racing toward superintelligence that could kill us all by the end of the decade.

原帖正文 Su olor le hace feliz 🥹Creado con GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2.5 en @capcutapp 🤍#capcut #capcutseedance25

原帖正文 >be me
>mathematician
>trying to solve one of the hardest problems in the field, million dollar prize on it
>grind it for a year
>every draft, idea, and dead-end goes into a hosted AI coding tool
>paying for it out of my own research funds
>bill is enormous
>August 2026, finally crack it
>rumour starts going round that someone solved a major open problem
>rumour is about me
>days later the AI company hosting all my drafts tells me its internal model has produced a 100 page proof
>it solved the same problem
>it took the same route
>a route nobody else on earth was working on
>suspicious.mp3
>ask whether my sessions were used for training
>"the model does not look up user data"
>huh?
>ask again
>silence
>mfw should've used Lumo

原帖正文 JUST IN: Former OpenAI & Anthropic researcher quits over fears AI race will lead to systems that destroy humanity."The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade."

原帖正文 Btw, this is the only mathematician who has solved one of the seven Millennium Prize Problems. he rejected both the Fields Medal and the $1M prize: > be Grigori Perelman > Russian mathematician > 16 years old > go to International Math Olympiad > score 42/42 > years later…… pic.twitter.com/dg2zBnAqsj