广场

My thoughts on the agentic video editing wave:1. There won't be one winner in agentic video editing. Speed, use case and workflow will always matter. Just as Cursor moves upmarket while Lovable caters to non-technical users, specialised video tools will continue to serve different audiences, even as general-purpose agents improve.2. Every major AI leap unlocks new product categories. Since GPT-3.5, we've seen coding, 3D and presentations. Opus 5.5 and Google's vision-language models are now unlocking agentic video editing. The edits still look more like websites than videos, but this is the worst they'll ever be.3. Editing costs will collapse, and the number of creators will explode. Basic edits could go from dollars to cents within a year, with huge speed improvements. Frontier models will still command a premium. As editing becomes effortless, recording content might be the biggest bottleneck.4. The best editors might be the biggest critics of agentic editing. Just as experienced engineers initially resisted AI-generated code over quality and maintainability, I think professional editors will eventually come around as the tools improve.5. The real magic is in iteration. Getting 80–90% of an edit right on the first attempt is great, but making it excellent requires much more iteration. The way creators give feedback, refine edits and make videos feel distinctly theirs is where these tools will become truly magical6. Anthropic's focus on coding enabled agents to build videos using HTML/CSS, SVG, browser rendering and OpenCV. Packages like Hyperframes, Rebooshed and VEED's OpenEdit gave LLMs editing capabilities they previously lacked. Opus 5.5 now makes many of those use cases redundant.7. Chat alone won't be enough for video editing. Chat will be central, but video operates across time and X, Y and Z coordinates. More sophisticated UI will be needed to make great edits.8. Brand consistency and repeatability remain unsolved. A Casey Neistat video feels distinctly his because of intentional creative decisions. Creators and brands need that same predictability across hundreds of edits. Even vibe coding hasn't solved this well (yet).9. Basic editing won't be a long-term moat. Anthropic, Google and OpenAI will eventually offer it. Deeper workflows, specialised use cases and excellent mobile experiences will drive differentiation.10. Don't reinvent professional editing tools. Building non-linear timelines is incredibly hard. Agentic video tools should focus on creating great first cuts and making it easy to hand them off to existing professional editing tools.Overall, the next six months will be noisy!But video editing has never been winner-take-all.And I do NOT think that will change.Hope this helps.

the double standards are actually insane